![]() ![]() Sean was a walking time bomb, & it was going to be the end of Mike that day had he not pulled that trigger. They catch the killers, but the Seans of the world get away without any charges for their criminal acts that often lead to the murders. ![]() However, this was not Tulsa, & even if it were, people like Sean fall through their system all the time. Watching "The First 48" you'd think Oklahoma cops are all very competent & justice-minded. i think he killed because he felt threatened but i dont think he felt threatened in physical ways really and if he did it wouldve had to been immediate which it wasnt hence the shot in the back ![]() and what about knocking his head out with the butt of the gun instead? mike made a jump from verbal warnings to shootings, when instead he could have climbed more slowly (verbal warnings > physical retaliation > physical harm > shooting) although i guess u could say non lethal physical harm would have made him come back harder so idk maybe that part is fine but still ultimately i think 80-90% chance mike ward is guilty. to be so megaoverdosed on meth would make you so clumsy that you dont look threatening really, and why the shot is in the back? it is just hard to believe that shooting a clumsy methhead in the back = self defense. i think mike ward was probably guilty, its too easy to imagine that he just wanted to teach a punk a lesson by pointing a gun at him and then after at least a year sean finally provoked him to finally do it. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |